WD3 Forum Index
  Register FAQ Search Memberlist Usergroups Profile Log in to check your private messages Log in 
Log in to check your private messages  ·  fChat
Friday Rant - command packs

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    WD3 Forum Index -> Wargames
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Giles
Count Suckula


Joined: 29 Sep 2006
Posts: 7401
Location: A cemetary in East London

PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 11:16 am    Post subject: Friday Rant - command packs Reply with quote

This Friday Rant isn't an alternative to the Friday Poll Laugh!

But I can't be the only person who gets annoyed when a range includes rank-and-file in several different poses (e.g. standing, firing, advancing, charging etc) but does not have command figures to match. Most ranges will stretch to standing and advancing/marching command figures, and sometimes people like the Perries will give you "charging" command to go with the charging rank-and-file. But occasionally you come across a range that only provides command in one pose.

What's prompted this rant is the fact that neither the Bicorne nor the Renegade ECW ranges have command in a post other than standing. There are one or two figures in their command packs that could, at a stretch, be used as walking figures, but all the standard bearers and officers are standing and pretty much all the other figures. Both ranges have a large number of rank-and-file packs thyat are advancing, marching, skirmishing etc. But all the command are just standing likes cows looking over a gate. I'm particularly surprised at Bicorne - given the huge range of figures, which I'm concluded allows it to stake a claim as the definitive 25mm ECW range, why on earth not just make 8 more figures for an advancing/marching command pack?

It's officially SILLY!!

Rah! Rah! Rah!
_________________
Has anyone seen my little blog?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Duck Crusader
General


Joined: 30 Oct 2007
Posts: 4173
Location: Somewhere in Kansas

PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 11:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Giles, I'm behind you 110% on that one. Good Rant!
_________________
When you're discussing MRE's in terms of acres you know something has gotten truly screwed up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Greystreak
Lieu


Joined: 25 Oct 2007
Posts: 642
Location: Buckinghamshire, UK

PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 11:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Completely agree Giles, and my sympathies. (Welcome to the nightmare world of 'conversions', to obliviate command figure ennui!)
_________________
Bryce
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
valleyboy
General


Joined: 01 Oct 2006
Posts: 3526
Location: NZ

PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 1:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

nah sorry but I think its a realistic approach Coffee







Well its like this - I'm the commander right - yeah ok
(*well its my garden and my toy gun or - I've got more gold braid than you)
*delete as appropriate
Ergo-
Now you lot, go and charge them over there, yes those big mothers with all those pikes and don't forget them ye old tanks as well

Colin and I,............. err I mean the Lieutenant and I will stand over here behind this wall while you do it

Call us when the job's done (or in a modern setting it could be text me)

I rest my case M'lord Smile

No need for charging command figures Smile
_________________
"Heads up by God, those are cannon balls not turds"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Duck Crusader
General


Joined: 30 Oct 2007
Posts: 4173
Location: Somewhere in Kansas

PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 1:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Won't work. They might get away with that nowadays (though they'll never be loved...) but the farther back you go the more important it is as a leader to be seen out front.
_________________
When you're discussing MRE's in terms of acres you know something has gotten truly screwed up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Timmo
General


Joined: 29 Sep 2006
Posts: 3403

PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 2:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If I can rant: I wish I could buy Perrys as single figures like Minifigs… but I can't. Rant over.

Giles

You could do some conversions – pike to officers etc But it is why I have most of my pike standing and they are easier to play with that way as well.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
WDP
Colonel


Joined: 21 Jan 2008
Posts: 1304
Location: Flatland, Belgium

PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 2:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Greystreak wrote:
Welcome to the nightmare world of 'conversions'


But... but... I enjoy doing conversions.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cornet
Major


Joined: 05 Feb 2009
Posts: 978
Location: Philadelphia, Pa.

PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 3:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Next Giles will be asking for Pioneer troops that aren't leaning on their shovels like modern road construction crews. The Pioneers should be charging at the woods with bayonets fixed! ... on their axes! Hmmm?

Actually, I agree with VB's position a bit; but I agree with Giles' rant more strongly. Command figures should be engaged in an activity similar to the troops they're commanding. It should be left to the hobbyist to match a command unit at rest with an advancing battalion, if he so desires.
_________________
Then let us fill a bumper, and drink a health to those/ Who carry caps and pouches, and wear the loup'ed clothes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
simon
Captain


Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 678
Location: Darkest Buckinghamshire

PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 3:21 pm    Post subject: Re: Friday Rant - command packs Reply with quote

Giles wrote:
This Friday Rant isn't an alternative to the Friday Poll Laugh!

But I can't be the only person who gets annoyed when a range includes rank-and-file in several different poses (e.g. standing, firing, advancing, charging etc) but does not have command figures to match. Most ranges will stretch to standing and advancing/marching command figures, and sometimes people like the Perries will give you "charging" command to go with the charging rank-and-file. But occasionally you come across a range that only provides command in one pose.

What's prompted this rant is the fact that neither the Bicorne nor the Renegade ECW ranges have command in a post other than standing. There are one or two figures in their command packs that could, at a stretch, be used as walking figures, but all the standard bearers and officers are standing and pretty much all the other figures. Both ranges have a large number of rank-and-file packs thyat are advancing, marching, skirmishing etc. But all the command are just standing likes cows looking over a gate. I'm particularly surprised at Bicorne - given the huge range of figures, which I'm concluded allows it to stake a claim as the definitive 25mm ECW range, why on earth not just make 8 more figures for an advancing/marching command pack?

It's officially SILLY!!

Rah! Rah! Rah!


Mainly because it costs money for each sculpt and it is more cost effective to pay, say £50-£100 for a sculpt that will sell in the hundreds rather than pay for a command figure that will sell in the tens. Supply and demand old chum. That is perhaps the main reason.
_________________
I manufacture wargame miniatures, I also paint and game (sometimes)

http://mywargamingcorner.blogspot.com/
www.parkfieldminiatures.freeservers.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Stavka
Lieu Colonel


Joined: 24 Apr 2008
Posts: 1036
Location: Tokyo

PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 3:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Simon beat me to it, but I agree. While I share Giles' feelings, financial reality at some point rears its ugly head.

The price of producing a miniature must be the same whether it be one of the Quality or one on the Hoi Polloi, but a manufacturer will never sell command figures at the same rate as the rank-and-file.

If a company has the cash reserves to get away with a variety of command figures, then sure, but otherwise most manufacturers would- very reasonably- be hedging their bets.
_________________
"History is my muse, not my tyrant." -me, 2009, channelling Eccles.

http://skyoriszag.blogspot.com/
http://serreslesrangs.blogspot.com/
http://marquissangfroid.blogspot.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ronan the Librarian
General


Joined: 03 Oct 2007
Posts: 3543
Location: The Wilds of Surrey

PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 3:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

1) I think we need to realise that the Perrys spoil us......because, err.....they can.

2) Wouldn't standing command be appropriate for firing/loading ECW types? It's really only the marching guys where they might look marginally out of place - and even then you can usually hide their stationery-ness with good basing.
_________________
Muttley, you snickering, cloth-eared hound - when courage is needed, you're never around.
Those medals you wear on that moth-eaten chest, should be there for bungling, at which you are best.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Giles
Count Suckula


Joined: 29 Sep 2006
Posts: 7401
Location: A cemetary in East London

PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 4:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Mainly because it costs money for each sculpt and it is more cost effective to pay, say £50-£100 for a sculpt that will sell in the hundreds rather than pay for a command figure that will sell in the tens. Supply and demand old chum. That is perhaps the main reason.


Simon, I appreciate that point. But if a company is going to release a command pack of 6-8 different figures (and these two companies have done) why not have 3 standing and 3 advancing? Why have all one pose and none the other? Why go to the expense of releasing advancing rank-and-file if you're not going to produce suitable command figures for them? I'd have thought that a point would be reached where the additional command figures recovered some of their costs simply by more people buying into the range as a result of the greater coverage of command figures... But I'm not going to second guess those at the sharp end of figure manufacturing.
_________________
Has anyone seen my little blog?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Stavka
Lieu Colonel


Joined: 24 Apr 2008
Posts: 1036
Location: Tokyo

PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 4:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Simon, I appreciate that point. But if a company is going to release a command pack of 6-8 different figures (and these two companies have done) why not have 3 standing and 3 advancing?


There's another side to that; if I want all my units in advancing poses, what am I going to do with the standing guys (or vice-versa)?

Which is why when possible I always prefer being able to buy individual figures over packs, as I can with Front Rank.
_________________
"History is my muse, not my tyrant." -me, 2009, channelling Eccles.

http://skyoriszag.blogspot.com/
http://serreslesrangs.blogspot.com/
http://marquissangfroid.blogspot.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bangorstu
Major General


Joined: 30 Sep 2006
Posts: 1764
Location: Bangor, Gwynedd

PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 4:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Regarding the price issue - if sold in packs command figures are always more expensive anyhow...
_________________
Eryri fynyddig i mi
Bro dawel y delyn yw.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ArchiducCharles
Lance Corporal


Joined: 02 May 2009
Posts: 30
Location: Montréal, Quebec

PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 5:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

- But if a company is going to release a command pack of 6-8 different figures (and these two companies have done) why not have 3 standing and 3 advancing? -

I would be the one to rant, then! Most of my units are in standing poses, not only would I have no use for half the pack (as Stavka mentionned) but I'm also stuck using the same three command figs for all my units instead of being able to create variations.
_________________
La Garde meurt mais ne se rend pas !

Clash of Empires : http://www.freewebs.com/archiduccharles/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Giles
Count Suckula


Joined: 29 Sep 2006
Posts: 7401
Location: A cemetary in East London

PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 5:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Which is why it makes sense to have a pack of standing command to go with your standing troops, and a pack of marching command to go with your marching troops...
_________________
Has anyone seen my little blog?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Timmo
General


Joined: 29 Sep 2006
Posts: 3403

PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 7:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

bangorstu wrote:
Regarding the price issue - if sold in packs command figures are always more expensive anyhow...


As RTL writes, the Perrys spoil us, Command are the same price as ORs and they do figures to match their poses.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jon Suth
Captain


Joined: 06 Apr 2007
Posts: 781
Location: Norfolk, Great Britain

PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 9:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Giles, its even more fundamental than variant command packs. WHY OH WHY don't manufacturers finish the bloody range off? How many times do you have to make do with other bodged bits and pieces to finish off an army?
Sure I understand that launching a new period or army is a big thing, risky too given I suspect that the majority of manufacturers don't do any market research to see whether anyone would buy them (aside from a handful of vocal nerdy types who pledge themselves to buy the French Ancilliary Troops of the 6 Hour War of 1822).
I know a lot of you hate them, but OG have got it right, they TEND to finish ranges and you can buy their command packs in packs of 20 figures, a nice range of poses with only some duplicate figures.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Norman D. Landings
Brigadier


Joined: 02 Oct 2006
Posts: 1632

PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 12:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh, dear... oh, I mean, seriously....

Call that a rant?!

'It's officially ( what was the word...?) SILLY!'?

You don't hold anything back, do you?

What's happened to us? We used to be *Trucking* disGRACEful! Now we're sitting wearing checked slippers and Man-at-C&A Actionslacks with easi-fit waistbands, calling people 'silly' while our mugs of ovaltine cool down.

ENOUGH, I tell you!
We are no mere poltroons, to be trifled with at the whim of the global miniature-producing mega-corporations!


ATTENTION BICORNE:
Giles wants runny commanders - Giles GETS runny commanders.
Or we'll grease up the diseased lab-monkeys and stuff 'em through your letterbox while you sleep!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ochoin
Major General


Joined: 16 Nov 2006
Posts: 1779
Location: brisbane, OZ

PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 2:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm with Norman on this one. For too long manufacturers have seen as as greying, portly geezers incapable of doing more than whining.
Unfortunately, they're correct in this estimation.
However, never too late!
Rally at Hyde's Corner tomorrow at 11 00. Bring your walking frames & a flask of Horlicks.
donald
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Etranger
General


Joined: 03 Oct 2006
Posts: 4091
Location: e-space

PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 4:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ochoin wrote:
I'm with Norman on this one. For too long manufacturers have seen as as greying, portly geezers incapable of doing more than whining.
Unfortunately, they're correct in this estimation.
However, never too late!
Rally at Hyde's Corner tomorrow at 11 00. Bring your walking frames & a flask of Horlicks.
donald


It's cold outside! Permission to be excused sir? I have a Doctors Letter from VB....
_________________
"If technology annoys you, I highly recommend shooting it to death. It's very cleansing......"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
valleyboy
General


Joined: 01 Oct 2006
Posts: 3526
Location: NZ

PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 5:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Etranger wrote:
ochoin wrote:
I'm with Norman on this one. For too long manufacturers have seen as as greying, portly geezers incapable of doing more than whining.
Unfortunately, they're correct in this estimation.
However, never too late!
Rally at Hyde's Corner tomorrow at 11 00. Bring your walking frames & a flask of Horlicks.
donald


It's cold outside! Permission to be excused sir? I have a Doctors Letter from VB....


yes that's correct Donald, ET has the worst case of fulminating testicular hyperhydrogonadalepidydematohaemorroidosis that I have ever seen, and that along with the fact that his eyes are too far apart, his left leg is shorther than his right arm and that there is very little between his ears renders him unfit for the planned demonstrations
_________________
"Heads up by God, those are cannon balls not turds"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ochoin
Major General


Joined: 16 Nov 2006
Posts: 1779
Location: brisbane, OZ

PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 9:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

And, evidently, ET's a serial killer as well.
Excused duty (said with a smile).
donald
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
valleyboy
General


Joined: 01 Oct 2006
Posts: 3526
Location: NZ

PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 9:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ochoin wrote:
And, evidently, ET's a serial killer as well.
Excused duty (said with a smile).
donald


Err a typo I think, he's actually quite harmless - the secret files were meant to read "cereal killer" on account of the no of packs of Special K he gets through a week (special k for special needs you see Smile )
_________________
"Heads up by God, those are cannon balls not turds"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Etranger
General


Joined: 03 Oct 2006
Posts: 4091
Location: e-space

PostPosted: Sun Jul 05, 2009 3:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You haven't seen me opening the boxes with an axe . (said with a manic glint in eye ....)
_________________
"If technology annoys you, I highly recommend shooting it to death. It's very cleansing......"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    WD3 Forum Index -> Wargames All times are GMT + 2 Hours


Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum